When people imagine Alaska, they think of sweeping wilderness, towering peaks, and the occasional moose crossing the road. But, the picture-postcard version doesn’t tell the full story. If you live here or even spend time in different corners of the state, you know it’s more complicated than that.
Alaska isn’t just one place — it’s a patchwork of stories, and crime is one of them. Some towns are safe harbors. Others are struggling. Let’s talk about where the state stands when it comes to crime.
If you’re wondering where violent crime is the least of anyone’s worries, these three towns deserve your attention:
With only 49 violent crimes per 100,000 people, it’s the safest place in the state. It feels like something out of a dream — eagles circling overhead, snowy peaks reflected in the water, and neighbors who know each other.
Valdez comes in second, with a violent crime rate of 78 per 100,000. It’s an oil town, sure — but it has the heart of a small community. Locals describe it as where the barista knows regulars by name before they even reach the counter.
Petersburg rounds out the top three at 120 violent crimes per 100,000. Known for its strong Norwegian roots and the Little Norway Festival, it’s a town full of charm — and fishing boats. Crime here? Still low. People look out for one another, and it shows.
Now, if you’re more concerned about your stuff than your safety, here are the towns with the lowest property crime:
Wrangell leads the state with just 49 property crimes per 100,000 residents. Tucked away on an island in Southeast Alaska, the town is only accessible by boat or plane. As one resident put it, “Where would a thief even go? There’s one ferry a week.” It’s that kind of place: quiet, close-knit, and hard to disappear in.
Craig, also on an island — Prince of Wales — has the second-lowest rate at 197 per 100,000. The economy there runs on fishing and timber, and it’s one of those places where everyone watches out for their neighbors.
Haines shows up again, this time with the third-lowest property crime rate at 294. Safe from violence and theft, it’s probably Alaska's closest to a crime-free zone.
Of course, not every corner of Alaska tells a story of peace and low crime. Some communities face serious, deep-rooted challenges.
Nome has the highest violent crime rate in the state — 1,513 incidents per 100,000 people. On paper, it’s a small town with fewer than 4,000 residents. But, in practice, it’s much more than that. Nome is a central hub for dozens of remote villages across western Alaska.
Kotzebue, just north of the Arctic Circle, ranks second with 1,469 violent crimes per 100,000 people. It’s a tight-knit town — nearly 90 percent of the population is Alaska Native — and, like Nome, it supports a large surrounding region with limited infrastructure.
Anchorage ranks third in the state with 1,062 violent crimes per 100,000 residents. As Alaska’s largest city, it faces the kinds of challenges that often come with urban life: drug activity, homelessness, property disputes, and mental health struggles.
But Anchorage is also distinctly Alaskan: Winters bring weeks of darkness; isolation isn’t something you can just drive away from; and the cost of living can make even the basics feel out of reach. That pressure builds. And, eventually, it spills over.
Now shift to property crime and the list changes:
Fairbanks leads the pack with 3,995 property crimes per 100,000 people. It’s a university town, home to the University of Alaska’s main campus, and the climate can be brutal. I was there for college; one winter, I remember car thefts getting out of hand. People would leave their engines running to keep cars from freezing — and thieves didn’t hesitate to jump in and drive off.
Sitting in the Mat-Su Valley, Wasilla ranks second with 3,781 property crimes per 100,000. The area’s been hit hard by the meth and opioid crises. A lot of the property crime here is linked to addiction — people stealing whatever they can for drug money.
Ketchikan, down in Southeast Alaska, rounds out the top three with 3,006 property crimes per 100,000. It’s a big cruise ship destination. During summer, the town’s population explodes as tourists pour in, which opens the door to more theft and petty crimes.
Alaska is a place of extremes, and its crime statistics reflect that. Some communities hold strong, while others are stretched thin. And behind every number, there’s a real person just trying to get by.
Right now, Alaska ranks second in the nation for violent crime. That’s not a brag — it’s a warning sign. Only New Mexico sees more. And when you break it down, the numbers hit hard: 726 violent crimes for every 100,000 people. That’s twice the national average.
The only bit of good news is that violent crime has been down 4.3 percent over the last year. It's a small step, but it’s a step in the right direction.
Ranked 20th in the nation for property crime, Alaska is close to the middle of the pack. Alaska has 1,877 property crimes for every 100,000 residents.1 It’s somewhat less than the national average — 2 percent less, precisely. But, don’t exhale just yet. Property crime was up 4.9 percent this last year.
So, yeah, it’s a mixed bag. Alaska is not the worst, but it’s nowhere near safe. The story becomes even more layered when you zoom in on different communities — Nome and Wrangell could not be more different.
Step into any small-town café or catch a local council meeting, and one topic always finds its way into the conversation: aggravated assault. It’s the most common violent crime in Alaska, showing up at a rate of 522.1 cases for every 100,000 people.
When you look at property crime, larceny theft tops the list. We’re talking 1,357.9 incidents per 100,000 — meaning theft, not violence, is the crime most Alaskans will likely encounter.
Break it down further and a clearer picture starts to form:
But, when you shift focus to violent crimes, things get heavier:
And then there’s the number that hits like a gut punch every time: 118.4 rapes per 100,000 people. That’s more than triple the national average — a 212 percent spike.
Some experts argue Alaska’s low population density might skew those numbers, but that doesn’t change the truth that people in the state live with. In isolated villages, help isn’t always close. It can take hours. Sometimes days.
No statistic can capture the full weight of that reality. But, they can point us toward what needs to change.
Alaska’s crime issues are shaped by geography, isolation, and tough living conditions. Many towns are cut off from the rest of the world, accessible only by boat or plane. Fewer police officers, delayed emergency response, and the high cost of essentials all add pressure to daily life. The challenges aren’t simple and neither are the solutions.
Then there’s the weather. In some places, winter darkness lasts for months. Temperatures drop so low that you’re stuck inside, and isolation can wear on people — especially in tight spaces.
We also look different from the rest of the country: more men than women, a younger population, and higher rates of alcohol use and addiction. But, there’s progress. Programs like Village Public Safety Officers are helping;2 tribal courts are stepping up; and communities are finding ways to tackle domestic violence and support families.
Life in Alaska isn’t easy, but that hardship forges strong community ties. Here, understanding crime isn’t just about numbers; it’s about neighbors looking out for each other and doing what it takes to stay safe together.
Unless specified otherwise, the information in this article is based on crime data compiled by the FBI and made available through the Crime Data Explorer. Statewide violent and property crime statistics are drawn from the FBI’s 2023 Crime in the United States Report (Table 5), while metro area data comes from Table 6, which breaks down offenses by metropolitan statistical areas. For city-level crime rates, we referred to Table 8, which lists reported offenses by state and city.
Important Note: Crime statistics offer valuable insights, but they aren’t the only way to evaluate a community’s safety. Local context, law enforcement practices, and reporting standards can all influence how crime is recorded. Additionally, FBI publication tables and the data displayed on the Crime Data Explorer may differ slightly due to variations in methodology.